Sunday, December 5, 2010
quick look at the poster
Now just need references and if want me to make any changes, dont be afraid to say so :) I keep updating the poster here
Monday, November 29, 2010
Robots vs Humans
http://bit.ly/bZFxB5
Robot arm punches human to obey Asimov's rules
I’m discussing this article because it has a close relation to a similar topic we watched a video on in class that I found interesting. A Slovenian researcher called Povse went against Asimov’s first rule of robotics, which states: “a robot may not harm a human”. In his experiments he specifically programmed a robot to deliver predetermined hits to a human subject at varying locations and speed.
He asked for ethical approval from a Slovenian university and then persuaded six of his male colleagues to volunteer to help develop robots’ reaction time to the presence of humans and determine the parameters within which they can safely operate in our vicinty. Povse borrowed a Japanese robot that was assembled to make coffe vending machines. This robot was programmed to move to a point in mid air where it would meet a specific point on the volunteer’s body. This test was tried with each colleagues eighteen times with the robot primed to strike at varying areas on their person.
The robot’s tools varied between a round, blunt, and sharper object. The volunters then were asked to determine the pain level of the collision ranging between painless, moderate, and even unbearable pain. Povse himself tried it and concluded that the pain factor was between “mild to moderate range”. They will continue testing with more severe pain factors using an artificial human arm. This is in order to develop robots into sensing when a human is close and realise to stop moving in time before hurting the people around it. Povse presented his work in the Systems, Man and Cybernetics in a conference in Turkey.
A worker named Sami Haddadin specialising in human and robot safety in the German Aerospace Centre announced that; "Determining the limits of pain during robot-human impacts this way will allow the design of robot motions that cannot exceed these limits." This same man earlier on the year put his own arms in the way of a knife-wielding kitchen robot to show how intelligent the robots with these sensors. Therefore he said it is crucial to develop these sensors even further if robots will ever work closely with humans. Even though this is true a a biomechanics specialist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston called Liebschner argued that they shouldn’t test pain as it’s not essential to prevent pain but injuries.
I personally found this article very interesting since it didn’t only link with the videos we have been watching in the lectures but also because we can clearly see that our world is developing into more and more computerised machines. This means that the safer they are, the better the robots and humans can work together at the end.
Robot arm punches human to obey Asimov's rules
I’m discussing this article because it has a close relation to a similar topic we watched a video on in class that I found interesting. A Slovenian researcher called Povse went against Asimov’s first rule of robotics, which states: “a robot may not harm a human”. In his experiments he specifically programmed a robot to deliver predetermined hits to a human subject at varying locations and speed.
He asked for ethical approval from a Slovenian university and then persuaded six of his male colleagues to volunteer to help develop robots’ reaction time to the presence of humans and determine the parameters within which they can safely operate in our vicinty. Povse borrowed a Japanese robot that was assembled to make coffe vending machines. This robot was programmed to move to a point in mid air where it would meet a specific point on the volunteer’s body. This test was tried with each colleagues eighteen times with the robot primed to strike at varying areas on their person.
The robot’s tools varied between a round, blunt, and sharper object. The volunters then were asked to determine the pain level of the collision ranging between painless, moderate, and even unbearable pain. Povse himself tried it and concluded that the pain factor was between “mild to moderate range”. They will continue testing with more severe pain factors using an artificial human arm. This is in order to develop robots into sensing when a human is close and realise to stop moving in time before hurting the people around it. Povse presented his work in the Systems, Man and Cybernetics in a conference in Turkey.
A worker named Sami Haddadin specialising in human and robot safety in the German Aerospace Centre announced that; "Determining the limits of pain during robot-human impacts this way will allow the design of robot motions that cannot exceed these limits." This same man earlier on the year put his own arms in the way of a knife-wielding kitchen robot to show how intelligent the robots with these sensors. Therefore he said it is crucial to develop these sensors even further if robots will ever work closely with humans. Even though this is true a a biomechanics specialist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston called Liebschner argued that they shouldn’t test pain as it’s not essential to prevent pain but injuries.
I personally found this article very interesting since it didn’t only link with the videos we have been watching in the lectures but also because we can clearly see that our world is developing into more and more computerised machines. This means that the safer they are, the better the robots and humans can work together at the end.
Snake rescue
This is a fantastic article about how technology can change our lives or should I say save our lives. Gavin Miller researched snakes and realised that we should appreciate them more than we do today. Their perfect movements, their ability to survive in many places and so on. Therefore he created a robot that looks like a snake which can be used to find bodies after catastrophes such as earthquakes, where these snakes can help find people under the ruins.
They tested one in the San Francisco Bay area after an earthquake. This robot snake has many wonderful functions or more like qualities that can help find people rescuers wouldn’t able to discover. This snake can be controlled by joysticks and it's made very easy. According to Miller they are radio controlled and they're untethered which means they carry their own computers and batteries. They were named S1, S2 and so on. They are kept in a two metre long tube which can be powered up. At it's head a camera is placed to make the search easier. This snake is also capable of automatically adapting to uneven ground which helps it to go under the ruins and look for survivors. There's a so called binaural stereo on the head of the snake which allows it to send back the sounds heard to the operator. As it approaches It sweeps the area around it with a pyroelectric device to look for body heat,In the event that the composite cable becomes tangled, or hinders the snakes movement it can detach from the tail and this can act as a base which enables the snake and the operator to communicate by a wireless device.
The snake now runs on internal power. Using a sonar system, the snake can detect a hollow area below it which could contain survivors. To gain access to this location it can place a small detonation device found under its chin. Upon moving back a safe distance the device is set off and creates a small hole which the snake can lower its head through. It then uses an infra red camera and microphones to locate any survivors. The snake also contains a built in loud speaker through which the rescuers can communicate or converse with the survivor, determine how badly injured they are and also to let them know that help is on its way. Once found the robot relays back information relating to the exact location of the individual and the exact path it took and the obstacles in between so as rescuers can plan the safest route.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
How to buy a laptop
I am prefectly aware that the title of my essay doesn’t include PC. My opininon is that PC’s are starting to become out of date and most people would prefer to buy a laptop rather than a home computer, therefore I’ll help you buy your laptop in an easy way.
First of all, I wouldn’t buy a laptop from online but I feel its a good start to look at what you’d like, since they can be seen and all of their most important information is explained perfectly. I would start looking at them from laptopsdirect.ie because they have all the trusted brands on their website. I especially like that website because it tells you in two ways about its product if not more. When you find a laptop you like the price and look of, you can see a product summary which is for people who has little knowledge of technology within computers. This summary consists of a brief summary of convincing you to pick their product and then the essentials that every people looks for in a laptop in the first place; screen size is given in inches and milimetres which lets you know how big your laptop is. Usually I wouldn’t suggest any size since everybody prefers something different. As I am a college student I would require a smaller one around 14” that can be easily brought into college and still can beautifully see the images or movies scenes you need. Unfortunately those tend to cost more than the larger ones.
The next is the Processor. Basically it only means that the better it is the faster your computer runs. Intel’s new “i” series procesor is at the top end of the performance market. Using the latest technology in, low power consumption, multi-core and new supersmall chips. That is why I wouldn’t advice a mini laptop. They usually only have single-core pentium which means that the more applications you’re using, the slower you’re laptop gets. If you don’t care about this because you’re only using your laptop for a few things or you don’t have enough money then AMD based processors are the cheaper alternative that use slightly less high tech ideas and processes in ther chips. They use more power that the equivalent intel ones and are not as powerful. I just call them the cheaper student laptops.
The RAM is the Random Access Memory. This is the short term memory that helps open programs faster and has information on hand for the processor to read. DDR2 is the standard type of ram that runs our computers. Windows 7 requires at least 1GB of RAM, but in my experience, you need at least 2GB if not more. DDR3 is the new type of ram that is twice the speed of the DDR2 RAM. This means that it can transfer data more quickly between the RAM and the processor but it’s used in more top spec computers.
Then there’s the hard drive. The standard type is a 7200 RPM spindle hard drive. This uses a small disk that is spinning inside the hard drive. This disk holds all the information. They are relatively fast and cheap to produce and they can range from 120GB to 640GB in a laptop which is more than enough for the average user. From this all we really need to know is that the sellers try to make the space available look bigger and use the number of GB’s before all the programs such as Windows 7 would be installed on it. Also this number tells you how much room will you have to download or keep your personal data. Solid State Drives (SSD) are the new cutting edge in technology, with blazing fast speed that leaves even the best spindle hard drive in the dust. They are very expensive and the GB/ euro is very low. They have no moving parts which means they last longer so if you have the money for it, don’t hesitate for even a second.
The Graphics Card have two main companies making them; ATI and Nvidia are high quality, high performance graphics cards. One of these cards are essential if you use your computer for multimedia or gaming. Even business computers require a certain level of graphics power. There are a lot of factors that determine how good a graphics card is but generally, the more dedicated the RAM on the card, the better. Intel also have their own graphics cards but they are nowhere near as powerful as the ATI or Nvidia ones. They are cheaper solution used in computers where the user has no real desire to play demanding games or multimedia editing. They’re also much cheaper so usually depending on what’s in your pocket you’re allowed to be picky with them.
The Optical drive is only where you put your DVDs and CDs. Nowadays loads of them can read and burn both CDs and DVDs. The new HD technology is Blue Ray, which you only have in more expensive laptops.
Then the operation system isn’t so hard to figure out either. The two main ones are Windows 7 and Vista. I never tried Vista, but I heard very bad things about it so try to avoid it if you can.
This was the summary with a little bit of salt. If you’re even more into computing, then you’re better off looking at the Tech Spec information on the website.
FLIES
I know it's wrong, my friend commented on her friend's flies on facebook and I really liked it. It's very sick and funny at the same time so I couldn't help but steal it and show it to all of you. I think it's genius! :)
Monday, November 22, 2010
Secret Kitten
I know it has nothing to do with ICT but I just couldn't leave it out :P
Had to repost it tho, since they deleted the other video :(
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Shorten links
I just realised I wanted to know this application for my blog and maybe even for twitter, if I'll ever use it.
I finally made the effort of looking at my notes and found out the way to shorten my links. Here it is:
Enjoy
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Friday, November 19, 2010
eLEGS
This is a video about how technological developments are good for our world and can help many people who are unable to walk.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Men soothed by sight of meat, study finds...
Meat, traditionally associated with bloodthirstiness and aggression, may actually have a calming effect, according to a new Canadian study that measured the psychological response of men to images of meat. McGill University researchers initially hypothesized that aggression would increase at the sight of meat, in accordance with an evolutionary point of view that links food with hunting and protective instincts.
Yet their experiment on the subject, which involved gauging the reactions of 82 men to various photographs of meat, found the opposite: The men became less aggressive at the sight of meat.
The results of the study, released yesterday, turn on its head accepted research saying that just looking at an object that has been associated with violence, such as a gun, can make someone more likely to behave aggressively.
"I wanted to know if we might respond aggressively to certain stimuli in our environment not because of learned associations, but because of an innate predisposition," said Frank Kachanoff, a researcher with McGill's psychology department. "I wanted to know if just looking at the meat would suffice to provoke an aggressive behaviour."
Researchers asked 82 men to sort photos -- some were given images of meat that was ready to eat while others had more neutral images -- as actors read from a script. Every time an actor made a mistake, the men were told to "punish" the actor by raising various volumes of sound, the highest levels believed by the subjects to be painful.
The results showed that men were less likely to attempt to inflict pain on the reader if they were looking at an image of meat while the mistake was made.
Mr. Kachanoff said our ancestors' survival instincts might have helped develop a calmer attitude around the family dinner table.
"It wouldn't be advantageous to be aggressive anymore because you would've already used your aggression to acquire the meat, and furthermore, you'd be surrounded by people who share ... your DNA.
"One of the basic principles in evolution is to want to preserve not only your DNA, but also that of your next of kin," he said.
He said it's difficult to say what practical applications could result from the study's findings. Before speculating, he would like to see similar results replicated with other variables thrown in, possibly using images of whole animals -- dead or alive -- rather than those of meat that is almost ready for consumption. As well, he said, he would like to see what would happen if women were tested and whether they would be targets of the aggression.
"It would be great if there are stimuli that would make someone less likely to aggress," Mr. Kachanoff said.
Bruce Friedrich, vice-president of policy for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), called the study's results "interesting."
"Clearly, eating meat does support horrible violence, but apparently somebody seeing meat that is not directly relatable to the animal does not cause people to become more aggressive," he said.
He speculated that the study revealed a Pavlovian response that partially simulated the physiological effects of eating meat, such as slower cognitive functions and blood flow.
That might be a valid point, Mr. Kachanoff said, adding that his group tried to account for it by having some vegetarians in the test group, and no major differences were found in their responses.
http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/soothed+sight+meat+study+finds/3797967/story.html
Yet their experiment on the subject, which involved gauging the reactions of 82 men to various photographs of meat, found the opposite: The men became less aggressive at the sight of meat.
The results of the study, released yesterday, turn on its head accepted research saying that just looking at an object that has been associated with violence, such as a gun, can make someone more likely to behave aggressively.
"I wanted to know if we might respond aggressively to certain stimuli in our environment not because of learned associations, but because of an innate predisposition," said Frank Kachanoff, a researcher with McGill's psychology department. "I wanted to know if just looking at the meat would suffice to provoke an aggressive behaviour."
Researchers asked 82 men to sort photos -- some were given images of meat that was ready to eat while others had more neutral images -- as actors read from a script. Every time an actor made a mistake, the men were told to "punish" the actor by raising various volumes of sound, the highest levels believed by the subjects to be painful.
The results showed that men were less likely to attempt to inflict pain on the reader if they were looking at an image of meat while the mistake was made.
Mr. Kachanoff said our ancestors' survival instincts might have helped develop a calmer attitude around the family dinner table.
"It wouldn't be advantageous to be aggressive anymore because you would've already used your aggression to acquire the meat, and furthermore, you'd be surrounded by people who share ... your DNA.
"One of the basic principles in evolution is to want to preserve not only your DNA, but also that of your next of kin," he said.
He said it's difficult to say what practical applications could result from the study's findings. Before speculating, he would like to see similar results replicated with other variables thrown in, possibly using images of whole animals -- dead or alive -- rather than those of meat that is almost ready for consumption. As well, he said, he would like to see what would happen if women were tested and whether they would be targets of the aggression.
"It would be great if there are stimuli that would make someone less likely to aggress," Mr. Kachanoff said.
Bruce Friedrich, vice-president of policy for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), called the study's results "interesting."
"Clearly, eating meat does support horrible violence, but apparently somebody seeing meat that is not directly relatable to the animal does not cause people to become more aggressive," he said.
He speculated that the study revealed a Pavlovian response that partially simulated the physiological effects of eating meat, such as slower cognitive functions and blood flow.
That might be a valid point, Mr. Kachanoff said, adding that his group tried to account for it by having some vegetarians in the test group, and no major differences were found in their responses.
http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/soothed+sight+meat+study+finds/3797967/story.html
Singing horses
Unfortunately I can't seem to make it appear but click on it, it'll brighten your day :)
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Photoshop
I've made this image by photoshop and I only put it up to show you what happens when you attend those once a week classes and you even listen to what the lecturer is saying. Also this is another way to show you that technology has amazing sides. Soon, we'll be able to do anything within photoshop. :)
Photoshop Tricks : How to Change Hair Color in Photoshop
I know some of you may have found using photoshop boring or difficult, so here's one good and very easy trick I found quite interesting. And I know it says change haircolour, but it can apply to other colour changes.
Hope it helps
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Interesting article
http://www.2knowmyself.com/relationship_breakups/why_do_we_fall_in_love
The answer is simple, its all related to how your mind works. If you are single or currently not involved in a relationship, your mind will always be on a hunt for your long awaited partner, even if you think that you don't care about that now, if someone did match your criteria then you will fall in love with them.
But why she? Why not someone else?
Each one of us has got some kind of a check list stored into his/her mind which includes some criteria that the other person must meet in order to qualify as someone who could be loved by him/her. If any of the listed items was not matched then the person becomes disqualified and you just think of him/her as a friend. The items in your check list are of course unique and specific depending on your background, values, past experiences and beliefs.
The following is an example of the first three lines of a check list of a guy called Sam. Sam is a guy and his list starts with the following three conditions:
People are usually unaware of their subconscious criteria and that's why they usually describe love as mysterious or as having no rules but the truth is that when you unfold your subconscious mind's criteria you will be able to know why do you fall in love, how to stop loving someone and how to make someone fall in love with you. (see how to make someone fall in love with you)
In my book “How to get over someone in few days” i said that you can fall in love with any person as long as he matches your subconscious criteria and that's why you should never feel bad after a breakup, simply because sooner or later you will find another person who matches your criteria and he may even be better than the old one.
Does love at the first sight really exist?
Yes it does. If someone met your unconscious criteria the same moment you saw him then most probably you will fall in love with him. You might be asking yourself, how can i know that he meets my criteria while i never talked to him before? The answer is simple, the criteria might involve items like the way he walks, talks or looks at you either because they have some connection to your past or either because they remind you of someone you loved before (people usually fall in love with those similar to the ones they loved before).
If your criteria depends heavily on looks then your chance of falling in love at the first sight will be much higher than that of a person who gives higher priority to the personality or other qualities. (For more details see Does love at first sight really exist?)
The book How to make someone fall in love with you was released by 2knowmyself.com; the book will dramatically increase your chance of letting someone fall in love with you.
Why Do We Fall In Love? (Based on the psychology of falling in love)
You were walking down the street, nothing was unusual and then suddenly she came out from a nearby shop and it happened that you fell in love with her at first sight! Huhh!! What happened?!!The answer is simple, its all related to how your mind works. If you are single or currently not involved in a relationship, your mind will always be on a hunt for your long awaited partner, even if you think that you don't care about that now, if someone did match your criteria then you will fall in love with them.
But why she? Why not someone else?
Each one of us has got some kind of a check list stored into his/her mind which includes some criteria that the other person must meet in order to qualify as someone who could be loved by him/her. If any of the listed items was not matched then the person becomes disqualified and you just think of him/her as a friend. The items in your check list are of course unique and specific depending on your background, values, past experiences and beliefs.
The following is an example of the first three lines of a check list of a guy called Sam. Sam is a guy and his list starts with the following three conditions:
- Item one: She must be from the same educational background.
- Item two: Her hair must be yellow (Sam has always failed to establish successful relationships with blonds in the past and this his subconscious mind included this item as a way to make him compensate for his past failures)
- Item Three:She must be assertive. Sam wasn't an assertive person and thing we get attracted to those who have what we need therefore Sam's mind has included this item in his criteria.
People are usually unaware of their subconscious criteria and that's why they usually describe love as mysterious or as having no rules but the truth is that when you unfold your subconscious mind's criteria you will be able to know why do you fall in love, how to stop loving someone and how to make someone fall in love with you. (see how to make someone fall in love with you)
Why do some people never recover from breakups
That's why people who think that there is something such as "the one" or the "soul mate" never recover from breakups, because they think that there is only one match for their criteria in this world and because they aren't aware of the fact that there are hundreds of people out there who could meet their criteria.In my book “How to get over someone in few days” i said that you can fall in love with any person as long as he matches your subconscious criteria and that's why you should never feel bad after a breakup, simply because sooner or later you will find another person who matches your criteria and he may even be better than the old one.
Does love at the first sight really exist?
Yes it does. If someone met your unconscious criteria the same moment you saw him then most probably you will fall in love with him. You might be asking yourself, how can i know that he meets my criteria while i never talked to him before? The answer is simple, the criteria might involve items like the way he walks, talks or looks at you either because they have some connection to your past or either because they remind you of someone you loved before (people usually fall in love with those similar to the ones they loved before).
If your criteria depends heavily on looks then your chance of falling in love at the first sight will be much higher than that of a person who gives higher priority to the personality or other qualities. (For more details see Does love at first sight really exist?)
The book How to make someone fall in love with you was released by 2knowmyself.com; the book will dramatically increase your chance of letting someone fall in love with you.
I know it seems quite long, but we were asked to put in an article, and I decided to find some fascinating but also psychology based information. While you think it'll take ages to read it is actually very fascinating and I think most people... well especially women have wondered about this.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Intro to my ICT blog
Hi my name is Zsofi and I was assigned to make my blog technology based. Sounds boring, right? Well it isn't. There are many extremely interesting articles and news about technology, that you might not even consider.
I will also inform you on how to buy a very good laptop/ computer within different price ranges. So keep up ;) Although if you look at my baby picture you can clearly see that even then I was interested in computers, so maybe you could call me a geek :P
I will also inform you on how to buy a very good laptop/ computer within different price ranges. So keep up ;) Although if you look at my baby picture you can clearly see that even then I was interested in computers, so maybe you could call me a geek :P
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)